<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 333 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217391</link>
    <description>SC held that a revisional judgment rendered by a judge who had earlier recused himself at trial, without disclosure of that recusal in the High Court proceedings, violated principles of natural justice and fair trial. The impugned judgment was set aside for bias/suspicion of unfairness, and the matter was restored to the HC for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 333 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217391</link>
      <description>SC held that a revisional judgment rendered by a judge who had earlier recused himself at trial, without disclosure of that recusal in the High Court proceedings, violated principles of natural justice and fair trial. The impugned judgment was set aside for bias/suspicion of unfairness, and the matter was restored to the HC for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>