<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 332 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217390</link>
    <description>The court affirmed its authority to frame additional substantial questions of law during the hearing under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The objections raised by the respondent were dismissed, and the appeal was scheduled for further hearing, granting the respondent an opportunity to file an appeal if necessary. The court&#039;s detailed analysis clarified legal provisions and aimed to ensure that all pertinent questions of law were addressed to uphold substantial justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 332 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217390</link>
      <description>The court affirmed its authority to frame additional substantial questions of law during the hearing under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The objections raised by the respondent were dismissed, and the appeal was scheduled for further hearing, granting the respondent an opportunity to file an appeal if necessary. The court&#039;s detailed analysis clarified legal provisions and aimed to ensure that all pertinent questions of law were addressed to uphold substantial justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>