<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 330 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217388</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that no rectifiable mistake existed in its order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the difference between rectification and review, advising the appellant to explore other legal options if unsatisfied. It stressed the significance of adhering to legal processes and providing substantial evidence in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 330 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217388</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that no rectifiable mistake existed in its order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the difference between rectification and review, advising the appellant to explore other legal options if unsatisfied. It stressed the significance of adhering to legal processes and providing substantial evidence in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>