https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217387 The appeal was made against an order confirming additions of Rs.31,91,414 on undisclosed investment in Bardana and Rs.3,47,272 on unaccounted interest received on Farmers advances. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the orders for both issues and remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for reevaluation due to lack of necessary reconciliation and detailed analysis. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, indicating a procedural victory for the appellant without changing the substantive tax liabilities. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217387 The appeal was made against an order confirming additions of Rs.31,91,414 on undisclosed investment in Bardana and Rs.3,47,272 on unaccounted interest received on Farmers advances. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the orders for both issues and remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for reevaluation due to lack of necessary reconciliation and detailed analysis. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, indicating a procedural victory for the appellant without changing the substantive tax liabilities. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217387