<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 319 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217377</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 15,00,000 based on the thorough analysis of evidence and legal precedents. The tribunal found that the appellant had fulfilled the requirements of section 68 by proving the identity and creditworthiness of the share applicants and the genuineness of the transactions, ultimately upholding the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 319 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217377</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 15,00,000 based on the thorough analysis of evidence and legal precedents. The tribunal found that the appellant had fulfilled the requirements of section 68 by proving the identity and creditworthiness of the share applicants and the genuineness of the transactions, ultimately upholding the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>