<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 315 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217373</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Tax Case Appeals, ruling that the assessee could not be held liable for interest under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. The court considered the ongoing debate on the joint venture&#039;s status as an Association of Persons and the consistent belief of the parties involved, concluding that no interest should be levied under Section 201(1A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 315 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217373</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Tax Case Appeals, ruling that the assessee could not be held liable for interest under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. The court considered the ongoing debate on the joint venture&#039;s status as an Association of Persons and the consistent belief of the parties involved, concluding that no interest should be levied under Section 201(1A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>