<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 313 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217371</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the income tax orders dated 22nd February, 2008, 26th March, 2008, and 14th March, 2012, due to lack of reasoning. It directed the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax to issue a reasoned order on the petitioner&#039;s stay application and outlined guidelines for future proceedings to balance revenue protection and petitioner&#039;s rights, including an undertaking from the petitioner regarding property dealings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 313 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217371</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the income tax orders dated 22nd February, 2008, 26th March, 2008, and 14th March, 2012, due to lack of reasoning. It directed the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax to issue a reasoned order on the petitioner&#039;s stay application and outlined guidelines for future proceedings to balance revenue protection and petitioner&#039;s rights, including an undertaking from the petitioner regarding property dealings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>