<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 309 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a token penalty on the appellant CHA firm for misdescription and undervaluation of goods, while dropping the penalty imposed on the partner under Sections 114A and 112 due to his lack of duty liability. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with no penalty upheld against the partner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 309 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a token penalty on the appellant CHA firm for misdescription and undervaluation of goods, while dropping the penalty imposed on the partner under Sections 114A and 112 due to his lack of duty liability. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with no penalty upheld against the partner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>