<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 303 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217361</link>
    <description>The government allowed the claimant to take re-credit of the erroneously paid amount in their Cenvat Credit Account, modifying the impugned order-in-appeal. The duty paid erroneously was deemed non-rebatable under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, in line with the interpretation of Section 5A(1A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The revision applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 303 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217361</link>
      <description>The government allowed the claimant to take re-credit of the erroneously paid amount in their Cenvat Credit Account, modifying the impugned order-in-appeal. The duty paid erroneously was deemed non-rebatable under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, in line with the interpretation of Section 5A(1A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The revision applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>