<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 300 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217354</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief by allowing the deduction for contract fees, reducing the disallowance of direct expenses, deleting the disallowance of bulk survey material expenses, as well as conveyance and telephone expenses. However, it upheld the disallowance of professional fees due to the lack of evidence establishing the business purpose of the fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 300 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217354</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief by allowing the deduction for contract fees, reducing the disallowance of direct expenses, deleting the disallowance of bulk survey material expenses, as well as conveyance and telephone expenses. However, it upheld the disallowance of professional fees due to the lack of evidence establishing the business purpose of the fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>