<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217351</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was admissible on service tax paid for outward freight used to transport final goods from the factory to customers&#039; premises for the period before 1.4.2008, because such transportation fell within the scope of &quot;input service&quot; under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Applying the cited precedent on identical facts, the Tribunal held that the denial of credit and the consequential demand could not be sustained. The impugned order was therefore set aside and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217351</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was admissible on service tax paid for outward freight used to transport final goods from the factory to customers&#039; premises for the period before 1.4.2008, because such transportation fell within the scope of &quot;input service&quot; under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Applying the cited precedent on identical facts, the Tribunal held that the denial of credit and the consequential demand could not be sustained. The impugned order was therefore set aside and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>