https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217345 The Court dismissed the revenue's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the ITAT order for the assessment year 2007-08. It upheld the acceptance of additional evidence by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, ruling that the assessee's non-appearance before the Assessing Officer was justified due to confusion over jurisdiction. The Court found no merit in the revenue's arguments against the additions made in the original assessment order under Section 144, leading to the appeal's dismissal as no substantial question of law arose. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217345 The Court dismissed the revenue's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the ITAT order for the assessment year 2007-08. It upheld the acceptance of additional evidence by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, ruling that the assessee's non-appearance before the Assessing Officer was justified due to confusion over jurisdiction. The Court found no merit in the revenue's arguments against the additions made in the original assessment order under Section 144, leading to the appeal's dismissal as no substantial question of law arose. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217345