<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 288 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217342</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, upholding the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The court allowed the entertainment expenditure incurred on employees, depreciation on the increased cost of fixed assets due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, payment to UP State Electricity Board as revenue expenditure, deletion of addition towards the value of closing stock, and deletion of disallowance of brand building and dealer loyalty expenditure. All appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 288 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217342</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, upholding the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The court allowed the entertainment expenditure incurred on employees, depreciation on the increased cost of fixed assets due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, payment to UP State Electricity Board as revenue expenditure, deletion of addition towards the value of closing stock, and deletion of disallowance of brand building and dealer loyalty expenditure. All appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>