<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 281 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. It concluded that the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified and quashed the order. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal reversed the CIT&#039;s directions, deeming the proposed revision futile. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful, and the CIT&#039;s order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 281 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. It concluded that the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified and quashed the order. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal reversed the CIT&#039;s directions, deeming the proposed revision futile. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful, and the CIT&#039;s order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>