https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217318 The revision applications were allowed in favor of the applicant, directing the sanctioning of the rebate claim based on the fulfilled fundamental requirement for claiming rebate. The Government found that despite discrepancies, the payment of duty on inputs used in manufacturing exported goods was not in dispute, and the verification revealed an excess rebate claim amount. Therefore, the impugned orders for recovery of erroneously sanctioned rebate claims were set aside, and the rebate claim was deemed admissible to the applicant as per approved input output norms. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217318 The revision applications were allowed in favor of the applicant, directing the sanctioning of the rebate claim based on the fulfilled fundamental requirement for claiming rebate. The Government found that despite discrepancies, the payment of duty on inputs used in manufacturing exported goods was not in dispute, and the verification revealed an excess rebate claim amount. Therefore, the impugned orders for recovery of erroneously sanctioned rebate claims were set aside, and the rebate claim was deemed admissible to the applicant as per approved input output norms. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217318