<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 263 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217317</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely on transporter records where the invoices, check-post records, transporter-linked documents and the assessee&#039;s and dealer&#039;s records support receipt of inputs. The dispute depended on factual appreciation of whether the goods covered by the invoices were actually received. As the revenue relied only on a transporter register describing the goods as miscellaneous and produced no independent corroborative evidence to show non-delivery, the Tribunal&#039;s finding that receipt was proved was neither unreasonable nor perverse. On that basis, the High Court found no substantial question of law for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 263 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217317</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely on transporter records where the invoices, check-post records, transporter-linked documents and the assessee&#039;s and dealer&#039;s records support receipt of inputs. The dispute depended on factual appreciation of whether the goods covered by the invoices were actually received. As the revenue relied only on a transporter register describing the goods as miscellaneous and produced no independent corroborative evidence to show non-delivery, the Tribunal&#039;s finding that receipt was proved was neither unreasonable nor perverse. On that basis, the High Court found no substantial question of law for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>