<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 260 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the order pronouncement, upheld the imposition of penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and rejected the invocation of section 80 of the Act for the waiver of penalties based on the arguments and evidence presented during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 260 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the order pronouncement, upheld the imposition of penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and rejected the invocation of section 80 of the Act for the waiver of penalties based on the arguments and evidence presented during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>