<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 253 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217304</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expedite the decision on the petitioner&#039;s appeal, preferably within four months from the date of the order. An interim order had previously restrained both parties from encashing the petitioner&#039;s fixed deposits, with a specific instruction for the petitioner not to withdraw more than necessary for regular activities. The Court prohibited the encashment of fixed deposits worth Rs. 20 crores until the appeal decision, allowing the petitioner to utilize the remaining fixed deposits as needed, emphasizing the importance of protecting the Revenue&#039;s interests while enabling the petitioner to manage its financial obligations within specified constraints.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 253 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217304</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expedite the decision on the petitioner&#039;s appeal, preferably within four months from the date of the order. An interim order had previously restrained both parties from encashing the petitioner&#039;s fixed deposits, with a specific instruction for the petitioner not to withdraw more than necessary for regular activities. The Court prohibited the encashment of fixed deposits worth Rs. 20 crores until the appeal decision, allowing the petitioner to utilize the remaining fixed deposits as needed, emphasizing the importance of protecting the Revenue&#039;s interests while enabling the petitioner to manage its financial obligations within specified constraints.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>