<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 249 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217300</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue authority against the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was dismissed. The ITAT&#039;s decision was upheld, emphasizing that incorrect claims do not automatically lead to penal consequences under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the rejection of the claim did not establish intentional concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars, based on legal precedents. The revenue failed to demonstrate intentional non-disclosure or provision of inaccurate details by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 249 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217300</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue authority against the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was dismissed. The ITAT&#039;s decision was upheld, emphasizing that incorrect claims do not automatically lead to penal consequences under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the rejection of the claim did not establish intentional concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars, based on legal precedents. The revenue failed to demonstrate intentional non-disclosure or provision of inaccurate details by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>