<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 235 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217286</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court, in a judgment delivered by Justices D.V. Shylendra Kumar and H.S. Kempanna, upheld the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the pre-deposit requirement for appeals under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized that waiver of pre-deposit is an exception rather than the rule, and highlighted the importance of clearly requesting such waivers in applications. It clarified that the Tribunal has discretion in dispensing with pre-deposit requirements based on factors like financial ability and undue hardship. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order and stressing adherence to statutory provisions and established practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 235 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217286</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court, in a judgment delivered by Justices D.V. Shylendra Kumar and H.S. Kempanna, upheld the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the pre-deposit requirement for appeals under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized that waiver of pre-deposit is an exception rather than the rule, and highlighted the importance of clearly requesting such waivers in applications. It clarified that the Tribunal has discretion in dispensing with pre-deposit requirements based on factors like financial ability and undue hardship. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order and stressing adherence to statutory provisions and established practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>