<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 230 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217281</link>
    <description>Iron ore fines arising incidentally during handling, sorting, grading and screening of iron ore used for sponge iron manufacture were treated as waste, not as a separate manufactured final product. Because the fines were neither the intended output nor exempted goods manufactured by the assessee, the common input service credit reversal provisions under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply. The demand for reversal of credit was therefore held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 230 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217281</link>
      <description>Iron ore fines arising incidentally during handling, sorting, grading and screening of iron ore used for sponge iron manufacture were treated as waste, not as a separate manufactured final product. Because the fines were neither the intended output nor exempted goods manufactured by the assessee, the common input service credit reversal provisions under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply. The demand for reversal of credit was therefore held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>