<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 213 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217262</link>
    <description>A subsequent opportunity before the appellate authority and remand proceedings cured the complaint of denial of effective hearing at assessment stage. Additions based on low drawings and household expenditure, unexplained investment in paintings, unexplained source for land purchase, and opening capital balance were set aside for fresh factual verification because the record required further examination of withdrawals, ownership, payments, valuation, and supporting material. The addition for cash found in the locker was sustained because no reliable evidence was produced to show that it belonged to the company or was otherwise explained. The matter thus turned largely on incomplete factual proof and the need for corroboration in disputed search-related additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 213 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217262</link>
      <description>A subsequent opportunity before the appellate authority and remand proceedings cured the complaint of denial of effective hearing at assessment stage. Additions based on low drawings and household expenditure, unexplained investment in paintings, unexplained source for land purchase, and opening capital balance were set aside for fresh factual verification because the record required further examination of withdrawals, ownership, payments, valuation, and supporting material. The addition for cash found in the locker was sustained because no reliable evidence was produced to show that it belonged to the company or was otherwise explained. The matter thus turned largely on incomplete factual proof and the need for corroboration in disputed search-related additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>