<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 211 -  ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues to the file of Ld CIT(A) for re-adjudication with proper hearing as the assessment order lacked detailed reasoning and the assessee was not given sufficient opportunity to present its case. The Assessing Officer disallowed all business expenses claimed by the assessee, but the Tribunal found that clear reasons were not provided for the disallowance. The Tribunal directed a re-adjudication by the Ld CIT(A) with due opportunity of hearing. The claim of interest expenses was partly disallowed due to lack of supporting documentation, and the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a re-adjudication with proper opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 211 -  ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues to the file of Ld CIT(A) for re-adjudication with proper hearing as the assessment order lacked detailed reasoning and the assessee was not given sufficient opportunity to present its case. The Assessing Officer disallowed all business expenses claimed by the assessee, but the Tribunal found that clear reasons were not provided for the disallowance. The Tribunal directed a re-adjudication by the Ld CIT(A) with due opportunity of hearing. The claim of interest expenses was partly disallowed due to lack of supporting documentation, and the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a re-adjudication with proper opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>