<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 200 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217249</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh consideration regarding the assessment of royalty expenses claimed by a publishing company for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper communication between authorities and granting the assessee a fair opportunity to present their case. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 200 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217249</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh consideration regarding the assessment of royalty expenses claimed by a publishing company for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper communication between authorities and granting the assessee a fair opportunity to present their case. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>