<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 196 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217244</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the suspension of the CHA license was revoked with immediate effect as the impugned order was not sustainable due to being issued beyond the prescribed timeframe under Regulation 20(2) of CHALR, 2004. The Member (Judicial) emphasized the necessity of adhering strictly to the legislative intent and guidelines provided by CBEC Circular No. 09/2010, stating that any delay in issuing suspension orders beyond the stipulated period renders the action invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 196 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217244</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the suspension of the CHA license was revoked with immediate effect as the impugned order was not sustainable due to being issued beyond the prescribed timeframe under Regulation 20(2) of CHALR, 2004. The Member (Judicial) emphasized the necessity of adhering strictly to the legislative intent and guidelines provided by CBEC Circular No. 09/2010, stating that any delay in issuing suspension orders beyond the stipulated period renders the action invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>