<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 190 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217238</link>
    <description>The court denied the application for condonation of delay of approximately 579 days due to lack of supporting documentation and skepticism towards the explanations provided. The court emphasized the importance of proper handling of cases and questioned the extent of departmental inaction without documentary evidence. The involvement of a tax amount of Rs. 28 lakhs was discussed, with arguments made regarding government decisions on amounts up to Rs. 10 lakhs. The judgment underscored the need for supporting documentation in such matters and considered the tax amount and government decisions in determining the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 190 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217238</link>
      <description>The court denied the application for condonation of delay of approximately 579 days due to lack of supporting documentation and skepticism towards the explanations provided. The court emphasized the importance of proper handling of cases and questioned the extent of departmental inaction without documentary evidence. The involvement of a tax amount of Rs. 28 lakhs was discussed, with arguments made regarding government decisions on amounts up to Rs. 10 lakhs. The judgment underscored the need for supporting documentation in such matters and considered the tax amount and government decisions in determining the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>