<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 681 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217233</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in reducing the personal penalty of M/s. Asian Plywood Industries without valid reasons, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the penalty with proper justification. The Court emphasized that any reduction in penalty must be supported by sound reasoning. The matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in line with the Court&#039;s directive, after answering the substantial question of law negatively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 681 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217233</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in reducing the personal penalty of M/s. Asian Plywood Industries without valid reasons, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the penalty with proper justification. The Court emphasized that any reduction in penalty must be supported by sound reasoning. The matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in line with the Court&#039;s directive, after answering the substantial question of law negatively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>