<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 185 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217232</link>
    <description>Supplies made under a project contract were treated as inter-State sales where the contract required manufacture outside Delhi and the movement of goods to Delhi was integral to performance; an express stipulation was unnecessary if the contract and movement had a real nexus. Goods imported for the project were also treated as being supplied in the course of import where the import was occasioned by the contract, even without direct privity between the end user and the foreign supplier. On that reasoning, the Delhi VAT levy did not apply to those transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 185 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217232</link>
      <description>Supplies made under a project contract were treated as inter-State sales where the contract required manufacture outside Delhi and the movement of goods to Delhi was integral to performance; an express stipulation was unnecessary if the contract and movement had a real nexus. Goods imported for the project were also treated as being supplied in the course of import where the import was occasioned by the contract, even without direct privity between the end user and the foreign supplier. On that reasoning, the Delhi VAT levy did not apply to those transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>