<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 172 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217219</link>
    <description>The assessee, a non-banking finance company, successfully claimed a deduction for the loss on exchange of Sri Lankan Rupees as a current asset. The Tribunal allowed the deduction, stating that the loss on foreign exchange is an allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the claimed loss on exchange was not notional and cannot be termed a provision. Furthermore, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of dividends refundable to purchasers, stating that such receipts are not income as the assessee holds them in trust for the rightful owners. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 172 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217219</link>
      <description>The assessee, a non-banking finance company, successfully claimed a deduction for the loss on exchange of Sri Lankan Rupees as a current asset. The Tribunal allowed the deduction, stating that the loss on foreign exchange is an allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the claimed loss on exchange was not notional and cannot be termed a provision. Furthermore, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of dividends refundable to purchasers, stating that such receipts are not income as the assessee holds them in trust for the rightful owners. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>