<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 150 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217197</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals by the Department for Assessment Years 1995-1996 and 1997-1998. It upheld the net method of valuation of closing stock and affirmed that MODVAT Credit should be treated as excise duty paid. The Court emphasized the significance of consistent valuation methods and proper treatment of excise duty in financial accounts. The judgment highlighted the impact of these decisions on tax liabilities and financial reporting obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 150 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217197</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals by the Department for Assessment Years 1995-1996 and 1997-1998. It upheld the net method of valuation of closing stock and affirmed that MODVAT Credit should be treated as excise duty paid. The Court emphasized the significance of consistent valuation methods and proper treatment of excise duty in financial accounts. The judgment highlighted the impact of these decisions on tax liabilities and financial reporting obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>