<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 145 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 54F for the flat purchased in the name of his minor daughter, despite the property not being in the assessee&#039;s name. The decision emphasized a liberal interpretation of the term &quot;assessee&quot; and legislative intent to promote house construction, allowing the appeal and granting the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 145 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 54F for the flat purchased in the name of his minor daughter, despite the property not being in the assessee&#039;s name. The decision emphasized a liberal interpretation of the term &quot;assessee&quot; and legislative intent to promote house construction, allowing the appeal and granting the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>