<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 141 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the denial of CENVAT Credit on capital goods used in an energy-saving project. The denial was based on the goods initially being used for exempted products, but the appellant demonstrated dual use in producing both exempted and dutiable goods. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for credit and penalties. Additionally, the appellant rectified instances of alleged double availment of credit, leading to the Tribunal dismissing penalties for the clerical error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 141 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the denial of CENVAT Credit on capital goods used in an energy-saving project. The denial was based on the goods initially being used for exempted products, but the appellant demonstrated dual use in producing both exempted and dutiable goods. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for credit and penalties. Additionally, the appellant rectified instances of alleged double availment of credit, leading to the Tribunal dismissing penalties for the clerical error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>