https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217157 The Appellate Tribunal remitted the case back to the adjudicating authority, setting aside the previous order. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration without expressing any opinion on the merits, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of all issues, including the eligibility of CENVAT Credit and the consumption of materials for capital goods fabrication. The decision aimed to ensure a thorough examination based on factual evidence and relevant judicial precedents, maintaining an open approach for further assessment. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217157 The Appellate Tribunal remitted the case back to the adjudicating authority, setting aside the previous order. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration without expressing any opinion on the merits, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of all issues, including the eligibility of CENVAT Credit and the consumption of materials for capital goods fabrication. The decision aimed to ensure a thorough examination based on factual evidence and relevant judicial precedents, maintaining an open approach for further assessment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217157