<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 105 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217152</link>
    <description>Captive consumption exemption was treated as unavailable by the department for alleged non-compliance with Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001, but the assessee relied on Rule 6(6)(vii) and the exemption for supplies made against international competitive bidding projects. On that basis, it demonstrated a prima facie case that the 5% or 10% payment under Rule 6 did not apply to the clearances in question. The pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was therefore dispensed with and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 105 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217152</link>
      <description>Captive consumption exemption was treated as unavailable by the department for alleged non-compliance with Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001, but the assessee relied on Rule 6(6)(vii) and the exemption for supplies made against international competitive bidding projects. On that basis, it demonstrated a prima facie case that the 5% or 10% payment under Rule 6 did not apply to the clearances in question. The pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was therefore dispensed with and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>