<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 98 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order under section 263 of the IT Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the original assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest due to inadequate examination of sundry creditors and lack of third-party confirmations. As the assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanations, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and directed a fresh assessment to be conducted after a thorough investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 98 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order under section 263 of the IT Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the original assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest due to inadequate examination of sundry creditors and lack of third-party confirmations. As the assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanations, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and directed a fresh assessment to be conducted after a thorough investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>