<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 96 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217143</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the question referred was not a question of law as the findings of fact were adequately decided by the lower authorities. The court found that the findings were not flawed and dismissed the tax appeal, emphasizing the significance of factual determinations and the requirement for cogent reasons and evidence in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 96 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217143</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the question referred was not a question of law as the findings of fact were adequately decided by the lower authorities. The court found that the findings were not flawed and dismissed the tax appeal, emphasizing the significance of factual determinations and the requirement for cogent reasons and evidence in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>