<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 94 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217141</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(C) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as there was no evidence of concealment of income based on the final assessment order. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer did not make any adverse findings or express any intention to initiate penalty proceedings, concluding that the penalty proceedings were without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 94 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217141</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(C) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as there was no evidence of concealment of income based on the final assessment order. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer did not make any adverse findings or express any intention to initiate penalty proceedings, concluding that the penalty proceedings were without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>