<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 91 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision that the receipts of Rs. 42,00,000 from M/s Forties Healthcare Ltd. should be taxed as professional fees under the head &quot;income from business or profession.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized the limited duration of the agreement, the absence of typical employment benefits, and the principle of consistency with previous tax treatments. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming that the income was not to be classified as salary income but as professional fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 91 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision that the receipts of Rs. 42,00,000 from M/s Forties Healthcare Ltd. should be taxed as professional fees under the head &quot;income from business or profession.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized the limited duration of the agreement, the absence of typical employment benefits, and the principle of consistency with previous tax treatments. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming that the income was not to be classified as salary income but as professional fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>