<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 89 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217136</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the additions for suppressed production and electricity expenses but dismissing the addition for interest expenses. The appellant&#039;s long-standing accounting method and lack of fresh discrepancies were considered in overturning the additions for suppressed production and electricity expenses, while the disallowance of interest expenses was upheld due to insufficient explanations provided by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 89 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217136</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the additions for suppressed production and electricity expenses but dismissing the addition for interest expenses. The appellant&#039;s long-standing accounting method and lack of fresh discrepancies were considered in overturning the additions for suppressed production and electricity expenses, while the disallowance of interest expenses was upheld due to insufficient explanations provided by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>