<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 76 - CALCUTTA, HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217123</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part, and the scheme was sanctioned with modifications. The effective date of conversion should be post-merger, and the discounted value must be the best possible one beneficial to the minority shareholders. The application for sanction of the scheme was allowed with consequential reliefs, and the appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 76 - CALCUTTA, HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217123</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part, and the scheme was sanctioned with modifications. The effective date of conversion should be post-merger, and the discounted value must be the best possible one beneficial to the minority shareholders. The application for sanction of the scheme was allowed with consequential reliefs, and the appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>