<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 71 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217118</link>
    <description>The rebate claim was rejected as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision to allow re-credit of duty paid on exported goods despite the time-barred rebate claim was deemed legally incorrect. The order-in-appeal was set aside, and the order-in-original was modified to reject the rebate claim entirely without permitting re-credit. The revision application succeeded, and the rebate claim was ultimately denied in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 71 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217118</link>
      <description>The rebate claim was rejected as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision to allow re-credit of duty paid on exported goods despite the time-barred rebate claim was deemed legally incorrect. The order-in-appeal was set aside, and the order-in-original was modified to reject the rebate claim entirely without permitting re-credit. The revision application succeeded, and the rebate claim was ultimately denied in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>