<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 68 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner, directed reassessment of interest under Section 75, and disposed of the Appeal. Compliance with the Finance Act, 1994 provisions was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 68 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner, directed reassessment of interest under Section 75, and disposed of the Appeal. Compliance with the Finance Act, 1994 provisions was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>