<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 61 - HIMACHAL PRADESH, HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217108</link>
    <description>The High Court of Himachal Pradesh held that deductions under Sections 80IB and 80HHC should be computed independently, allowing full deductions for each section without proportionate reduction. Section 80IA(9) restricts total deductions to prevent exceeding business profits but does not impact individual section deductions. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s interpretation to ensure statutory compliance and prevent double benefits. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 61 - HIMACHAL PRADESH, HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217108</link>
      <description>The High Court of Himachal Pradesh held that deductions under Sections 80IB and 80HHC should be computed independently, allowing full deductions for each section without proportionate reduction. Section 80IA(9) restricts total deductions to prevent exceeding business profits but does not impact individual section deductions. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s interpretation to ensure statutory compliance and prevent double benefits. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>