<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 60 - HIMACHAL PRADESH, HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217107</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C is mandatory but must be explicitly stated in the assessment order. Without such mention, the revenue cannot demand interest through a notice of demand. The court dismissed the appeal, citing the necessity for clear imposition of interest in assessment orders before its collection can be pursued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 60 - HIMACHAL PRADESH, HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217107</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C is mandatory but must be explicitly stated in the assessment order. Without such mention, the revenue cannot demand interest through a notice of demand. The court dismissed the appeal, citing the necessity for clear imposition of interest in assessment orders before its collection can be pursued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>