<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 56 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition made under section 69 of the I.T. Act, 1961. The appellant successfully argued that the stock addition was based solely on a loose sheet without sufficient corroborative evidence. As the books of account were not rejected and previous year&#039;s closing stock was accepted, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and rejecting the legal presumption under section 292C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 56 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition made under section 69 of the I.T. Act, 1961. The appellant successfully argued that the stock addition was based solely on a loose sheet without sufficient corroborative evidence. As the books of account were not rejected and previous year&#039;s closing stock was accepted, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and rejecting the legal presumption under section 292C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>