<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 47 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for A.Y. 2000-01 and 2002-03, partially allowed for A.Y. 2001-02 for statistical purposes, and partially allowed for A.Y. 2003-04 and 2004-05. The decisions were made due to the assessee&#039;s inability to provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate their claims regarding depreciation, administrative expenses, donations, theft loss, cash in hand, commission expenses, and cash deposits in the bank.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 07:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 47 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for A.Y. 2000-01 and 2002-03, partially allowed for A.Y. 2001-02 for statistical purposes, and partially allowed for A.Y. 2003-04 and 2004-05. The decisions were made due to the assessee&#039;s inability to provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate their claims regarding depreciation, administrative expenses, donations, theft loss, cash in hand, commission expenses, and cash deposits in the bank.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>