<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 44 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217090</link>
    <description>The Court held that interest under Rule 8 of FEMA rules cannot be awarded on seized foreign currency through a writ petition. The judgment allowing interest on foreign currency was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, dismissing the respondent&#039;s petition. The Court clarified that Rule 8 applies to seizure under Section 37 of FEMA, distinguishing between Indian and foreign currency for interest provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 44 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217090</link>
      <description>The Court held that interest under Rule 8 of FEMA rules cannot be awarded on seized foreign currency through a writ petition. The judgment allowing interest on foreign currency was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, dismissing the respondent&#039;s petition. The Court clarified that Rule 8 applies to seizure under Section 37 of FEMA, distinguishing between Indian and foreign currency for interest provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>