<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 42 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217088</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellant against the revenue. The judgment clarified that failure to meet the Customs notification conditions precluded confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Act. Compliance with notification requirements was deemed crucial to avail exemptions and prevent confiscation actions. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 42 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217088</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellant against the revenue. The judgment clarified that failure to meet the Customs notification conditions precluded confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Act. Compliance with notification requirements was deemed crucial to avail exemptions and prevent confiscation actions. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>