<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 37 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal on duty demands, penalties, and other issues raised. The demand for duty on goods manufactured to compensate for burning loss was found unsustainable, penalties were reduced for Cenvat credit discrepancies, and penalties on company officials were set aside. New issues raised by Revenue in the second appeal were dismissed as they were not raised earlier. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on all counts, concluding in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 37 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal on duty demands, penalties, and other issues raised. The demand for duty on goods manufactured to compensate for burning loss was found unsustainable, penalties were reduced for Cenvat credit discrepancies, and penalties on company officials were set aside. New issues raised by Revenue in the second appeal were dismissed as they were not raised earlier. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on all counts, concluding in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>