https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217076 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax demand for cargo handling services. The Tribunal found that the appellant was not liable for the extended period demand as there was no intention to suppress material facts. It was clarified that transportation and stacking within the stockyard did not constitute cargo handling services. The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand, allowing both appeals and providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217076 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax demand for cargo handling services. The Tribunal found that the appellant was not liable for the extended period demand as there was no intention to suppress material facts. It was clarified that transportation and stacking within the stockyard did not constitute cargo handling services. The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand, allowing both appeals and providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217076